Posts Tagged ‘Meena Kumari’

Whose side are the courts on? Can legislation make shared parenting work?

Friday, February 10th, 2012

Ridley & Hall Solicitors Huddersfield Family LawWhen a relationship breaks down, do the Courts take sides when issues of residence or contact have to be sorted out? Some fathers feel that there is a bias to mothers – many mothers consider this isn’t the case.

The Government wants to put an end to such thinking. It has just published its ‘Response to the Family Justice Review’. It is determined to make clear that there will be a legal right for the children to have a relationship with both parents after divorce or separation and ensure that more children from separated families enjoy close relationships with both their parents.

In respect of shared parenting the government considers there is a need to clarify and restore public confidence that the courts recognise the joint nature of parenting. It will therefore legislate to emphasise the importance of children having an ongoing relationship with both their parents after family separation, where that is safe, and in the child’s best interests.

Meena Kumari Head of Family Law at Ridley and Hall Solicitors commented:

“Parental separation leads to thousands of children losing meaningful contact with a non resident parent who once was an integral part of the family unit involved in all aspects of the child’s welfare and development.

“The rules will make it much clearer that it is vital for children to have ongoing relationships with both parents unless there are concerns about the parent’s behaviour affecting the child’s welfare.

The changes are part of an overhaul of family law where a presumption of shared parenting will give stronger rights for parents to see their children and provide recognition of equal parenting which is currently absent in the law.

The Government intends that this change will provide loving absent parents with a greater and stronger position of contact with their children after separation rather than relying on Court or the other parent to determine their contact and access. Some commentators are concerned that similar legislation introduced in Australia in 2006 had a negative effect in encouraging more litigation between parents”.

The change in law however will not guarantee equal access as sought by many family rights campaigners.

Can legislation solve the often bitter disputes over residence and contact? Only time will tell.”

For further information and advice about family law issues, please contact Meena Kumari at Ridley & Hall Solicitors, Queens House, 35 Market Street, Huddersfield, HD1 2HL, Tel: 01484 538421 or visit www.ridleyandhall.co.uk

Grandparents’ hopes dashed

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Ridley & Hall Solicitors Huddersfield Family LawWhen parents separate it can be an extremely emotional time for children.  Having contact with grandparents can help.  Often if there is an acrimonious split, grandparents (along with other extended members of the family) can be unreasonably refused contact.  As a result the child not only has to adjust to their parents’ separation, but also losing contact with the whole of one side of their family.

In recent years the vital role that grandparents play in families has been recognised and a number of support organisations have been established such as the Grandparents’ Association and Grandparents Plus,  who have been campaigning for increased rights for grandparents.

Unfortunately, hopes have been dashed by a recent report. The Family Justice Review panel was appointed to review the whole of the family justice system in England and Wales, looking at all aspects of the system from court decisions on taking children into care, to disputes over contact with children when parents divorce. It was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice, the Department for Education, and the Welsh Government. It published its final report in November 2011, and confirmed that there are no plans to change the current legal position of grandparents.

At the moment absent parents can make an application to court for contact with children  - but grandparents must get the Court’s permission (called ‘leave’) before they can then make an application for contact.  The requirement “prevents hopeless or vexatious applications that are not in the interests of the child”.  The parents of the child are able to oppose even the grandparents’ application for leave, as well as any subsequent application for contact.

So how can grandparents pursue contact with their grandchildren when it is being refused by parents?

The law does recognise the important role that the grandparents play in the child’s life even after parents separate.  If a grandparent can demonstrate that they did have regular contact with the child then their application for leave should not be refused by the Court.  Once a grandparent has been granted permission by the Court to apply for contact then the child’s welfare is the Court’s prime concern – it must be in the child’s best interest to exercise contact with a grandparent.  One vital consideration is whether or not grandparents have unnecessarily taken sides in the separation.  Grandparents must stay neutral in the separation and ensure that their grandchildren are not exposed to inappropriate comments about their parents.

Ridley & Hall’s award winning family law team understands the often heartbreaking situations that grandparents can find themselves in.  We have strong links with support groups including the Grandparents’ Association, Family Rights Group, Grandparents Plus, Grandparents Raising Grandchildren Network and Bridges and we are frequently involved in national groundbreaking cases.

For further advice about grandparents’ rights please contact Meena Kumari, Johanna Allen or Helen Dandridge on 01484 538421 or visit www.ridleyandhall.co.uk

National recognition for Huddersfield law firm

Tuesday, September 27th, 2011

Ridley & Hall Solicitors Huddersfield Legal 500Huddersfield based solicitors Ridley and Hall have been recognised as national experts by a legal publication.

The Legal 500, published for over twenty years provides the most comprehensive worldwide coverage currently available on legal services providers, in over 100 countries.

It’s used as a yardstick to measure firms by commercial and private clients as well as professional advisers. The Legal 500 is widely regarded as offering the definitive judgement of law firm capabilities. The publication is updated every year and relies on reports not just from solicitors firms themselves but also interviews with clients.

Ridley and Hall has been particularly recommended for it’s expertise in family law and trusts and probate. The family team headed up by partner Meena Kumari deals with divorce and financial issues as well as domestic violence and parents seeking contact with children. The firm also has a specialist child care team which includes award winning partners Nigel Priestley and Michael George.

Susan Cash who heads up the wills, trusts and probate team said “We’ve recently launched a service for those nearing or at retirement age called ‘elderflower’ (www.elderfloweradvice.co.uk) because we feel strongly that older clients need specialist advice.  Membership of the Legal 500 provides further assurance of our expertise to offer this service.”

Business Development Partner Adam Fletcher commented “ I’d like to thank our clients who were willing to recommend us; it’s their recognition that really means a lot. For a small firm in West Yorkshire this is quite an achievement!”

For more information about the services offered by Ridley & Hall Solicitors please visit www.ridleyandhall.co.uk or call 01484 538421. For details of the recently launched ‘elderflower’ service for people approaching or at retirement age please visit www.elderfloweradvice.co.uk